Executive Health Administration

DC Health Policy Forum Focuses on Shaping Nation’s Healthcare System

[fa icon="calendar'] Mar 22, 2016 9:00:00 AM / by Cheryl Arvidson


Price faculty, students and alumni convene at the inaugural Washington, D.C., Health Policy Forum. (Photo by Dave Scavone) 


The inaugural Washington, D.C., Health Policy Forum brought together leading experts from the federal government, industry and academia — giving students and alumni from the USC Price School of Public Policy the opportunity to delve deeply into the intricacies of making changes to the nation’s healthcare system.


Professor Paul Ginsburg (Photo by Dave Scavone)


The program, hosted by USC Price’s graduate health administration programs on Feb. 5 and 6, was put together by USC Price Professor Paul Ginsburg, a noted healthcare expert and the Norman Topping Chair in Medicine and Public Policy. The event focused on three sectors that play key roles in developing, enacting and influencing federal health policies: Congress, the Executive Branch, and the numerous interest groups whose members are directly affected by these laws and regulations.

“The purpose of this program is for our students to better understand the policy concerns at the federal and state level, as well as some of the reform issues we are dealing with now,” said Vice Dean and Professor Michael B. Nichol, who directs the school’s graduate programs in health. “They’re hearing about how the process works behind the scenes, how there is collaboration on both sides of the aisle on the staff side to find ways to get things done on Capitol Hill, and how input from interest groups provides information on the real impact of the proposals.”


Vice Dean Mike Nichol (Photo by Dave Scavone)


Examining the big picture

One major focus of the event included potential policy issues over the next two years.

Ginsburg, who also serves as director of public policy at the USC Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, told the group that looking ahead to 2016 and 2017, possible Congressional action on the ACA includes changing the so-called Cadillac tax that would end unlimited tax deductions for health benefits, seeking ways to lower individual policy premiums, reducing or eliminating employer mandates, tightening enrollment opportunities outside of open season, and improving risk adjustment. He said he also expects Congress to look at ways to speed Food and Drug Administration reviews to spur competition for innovative drugs, and to consider rate caps for small-market generic drugs.

However, one thing sure to be left off the agenda will be single-payer healthcare, regardless of what some presidential candidates may be proposing, Ginsburg said.

The day’s speakers addressed a wide range of topics and drew on their experiences to make their points about policymaking in healthcare. These included the shifting of policymaking from committees to the leadership in Congress, and from Cabinet secretaries to the White House in the administration. They addressed the role of staff in Congress and the good relationships between many staff across the aisle, who need to work together effectively to get legislation passed. Speakers also described how stakeholder groups exert influence on the policy process and state health policy within the framework of the federal system.


Speakers, from left: Alissa Fox of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association; Linda Bilheimer of the Congressional Budget Office; Wendell Primus from the Office of the Minority Leader, U.S. House of Representatives; David Helms of Johns Hopkins University; and Marie Michnich of the National Academy of Medicine (Photo by Dave Scavone)


Informing future leaders

Executive Master of Health Administration student Angie Simpson of Thousand Oaks – who is graduating in May – noted how insights gained at the forum not only will inform her professional work in the pharmaceutical industry but also better prepare her to run for a city council seat.

“Having an understanding about the role of federal agencies will help me in my job, and having a strong foundation in healthcare will be helpful as health issues become more important in the election,” she said.

Nichol hopes the Washington forum will become an annual program for health administration students and alumni.

“The students have gotten a great deal from it, not only information and learning but also networking,” Nichol said. “We’re excited to keep this program going.”


This article originally appeared at USC Price News.



Topics: Health Policy

Cheryl Arvidson

Written by Cheryl Arvidson

Subscribe to Email Updates

See if an Executive Masters of Health Administration is for you

Recent Posts